![Ca db2 tools wiki](https://knopkazmeya.com/26.png)
Overall, the performance of the MateBook 14 is very good and only drops by 10% in the course of the test. However, the difference turns out much larger in native applications. The MacBook Air with its M1 chip is about 10% faster in the virtualized Cinebench benchmark. The sibling model with the AMD hexa-core CPU is again 40% faster, and the octa-core Ryzen 7 5700U should set the standards here. With this, the predecessor is surpassed by a total of 66%. During this time, the core temperatures increase to more than 90 ☌ (194 ☏). Over the whole period of the test loop, the average is 3.6 GHz with 33 watts, which is a very good result. Even before the one-minute mark is reached, it starts changing periodically between 3.5 and 4.6 GHz, with some rare drops to 2 GHz. After one second, this drops to 3.6 GHz and a consumption of 32 watts. In our Cinebench-R15 loop, the processor starts out at 4x4 GHz with a consumption of 40 watts. The quad-core processor of our test unit is an Intel Core i7-1165G7 with a clock speed of between 2.8 and 4.4 GHz. Even if our test unit shows some screen bleeding and clouding, this will remain unnoticeable in everyday operation. The resolution of 2,160 x 1,440 and its resulting pixels density of 185 ppi, together with the touchscreen functionality, round up the display functionality. And in the Delta-E values as well, only the MacBook offers a better performance. By the way, with a value of 98.5% in the DCI-P3 area, the M1 MacBook Air offers the best color accuracy. At an average brightness of 367 cd/m² (408 cd/m² peak), the manufacturer specification of 300 cd/m² is exceeded significantly, even if the predecessor and the AMD sibling model (without touchscreen) are again brighter at about 450 cd/m².Īt 2,510:1, the contrast we measured also jumps to previously unknown highs for IPS panels (1,500:1 according to the manufacturer), leaving the competitors behind, except for the Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 which has an even minimally higher contrast at 2,646:1. However, things look more average in the expanded color spaces, such as 67.5% of the AdobeRGB color space. Even if it doesn't quite reach the 100% coverage of the sRGB color space promised by the manufacturer, the value is still very good at 97.4%. The 14-inch display in 3:2 format not only shines visually, but also in terms of some of its measurements. In terms of the price, the model with the AMD Ryzen 5 5500U costs about 100 to 150 Euros (~$108 - $162) less than the Intel version. In addition to the Intel Core-i7 version we are testing here, there is also an otherwise identical MateBook 14 with AMD Ryzen CPUs, which we are able to test at the same time and also compare to the Intel model. Other comparisons that should be interesting include Huawei's in-house MateBook 14s and MateBook X Pro. You can even get it on sale for 100 to 150 Euros (~$108 - $162) less most of the time.Īpple's MacBook Air M1 and the Schenker Vision 14, which are its direct competitors, fall into a similar price segment, together with Microsoft's Surface Laptop 3 and the Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14. Correspondingly, for about 1100 Euros (~$1189), it is of course also more affordable than most of the flagship models.
INTEL USB DRIVERS FOR TOSHIBA SATELLITE A1595 PRO
It can be placed in the mid-range, below the MateBook X Pro and above the MateBook D 14.
![intel usb drivers for toshiba satellite a1595 intel usb drivers for toshiba satellite a1595](https://c1.neweggimages.com/ProductImageCompressAll1280/34-216-772-13.jpg)
The Huawei MateBis a classic ultrabook with a 3:2-format touchscreen.
![Ca db2 tools wiki](https://knopkazmeya.com/26.png)